Incidence of Weaning Failure in Obese Patients in Intensive Care Unit.

Background The escalating prevalence of obesity worldwide presents unique challenges in critical care management, especially in the context of mechanical ventilation and weaning processes in intensive care units (ICUs). The present study aimed to determine the incidence of weaning failure in obese patients in an ICU. Methods A prospective observational study was carried out to gather data on patients in the ICU of Shifa International Hospital located in Islamabad, Pakistan. The target population consisted of adult patients who were both male and female, ages 18 years and above. These individuals required intubation procedures as well as mechanical ventilation during their hospitalization. The researchers followed these patients prospectively and observed their medical conditions closely to gather data about how obesity might impact critical care interventions and outcomes. Results The sample size was 288 bearing a median age of 61.0 with an interquartile range of 19 years. Older age manifested a significantly higher frequency of failed extubation (p=0.065). Higher body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with failed extubation among the study population. It was found that a higher significant difference was associated with BMI > 30 kg/m2 (obese) in failed and successful extubation. One-half of the patients with failed extubation and only 16 (5.9%) patients with successful extubation had end-stage renal disease (p<0.001). It was found that patients who underwent failed extubation had notably increased ICU mortality (p=0.108), 28-day mortality (p=0.067), as well as mean ICU (p<0.001) and hospital stay (p=0.007). Conclusion Our study revealed some insightful correlations between obesity, age, comorbidities, length of hospitalization, ICU stay, and mortality rate in terms of weaning failure among the study population.

Is EIT-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration for optimizing PEEP in ARDS the white elephant in the room? A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a novel real-time lung imaging technology for personalized ventilation adjustments, indicating promising results in animals and humans. The present study aimed to assess its clinical utility for improved ventilation and oxygenation compared to traditional protocols. Comprehensive electronic database screening was done until 30th November, 2023. Randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, comparative cohort studies, and assessments of EIT-guided PEEP titration and conventional methods in adult ARDS patients regarding outcome, ventilatory parameters, and P/F ratio were included. Our search retrieved five controlled cohort studies and two RCTs with 515 patients and overall reduced risk of mortality [RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.95; I2 = 0%], better dynamic compliance [MD = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.59 to 5.34; I2 = 0%] with no significant difference in PaO2/FiO2 ratio [MD = 6.5; 95%CI -13.86 to 26.76; I2 = 74%]. The required information size except PaO2/FiO2 was achieved for a power of 95% based on the 50% reduction in risk of mortality, 10% improved compliance as the cumulative Z-score of the said outcomes crossed the alpha spending boundary and did not dip below the inner wedge of futility. EIT-guided individualized PEEP titration is a novel modality; further well-designed studies are needed to substantiate its utility.

The Respiratory Mechanics of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-Lessons Learned?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a well-defined clinical entity characterized by the acute onset of diffuse pulmonary injury and hypoxemia not explained by fluid overload. The COVID-19 pandemic brought about an unprecedented volume of patients with ARDS and challenged our understanding and clinical approach to treatment of this clinical syndrome. Unique to COVID-19 ARDS is the disruption and dysregulation of the pulmonary vascular compartment caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is a significant cause of hypoxemia in these patients. As a result, gas exchange does not necessarily correlate with respiratory system compliance and mechanics in COVID-19 ARDS as it does with other etiologies. The purpose of this review is to relate the mechanics of COVID-19 ARDS to its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and outline the lessons we have learned in the management of this clinic syndrome.

Mean airway pressure as a parameter of lung-protective and heart-protective ventilation.

Mean airway pressure (MAP) is the mean pressure generated in the airway during a single breath (inspiration + expiration), and is displayed on most anaesthesia and intensive care ventilators. This parameter, however, is not usually monitored during mechanical ventilation because it is poorly understood and usually only used in research. One of the main determinants of MAP is PEEP. This is because in respiratory cycles with an I:E ratio of 1:2, expiration is twice as long as inspiration. Although MAP can be used as a surrogate for mean alveolar pressure, these parameters differ considerably in some situations. Recently, MAP has been shown to be a useful prognostic factor for respiratory morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients of various ages. Low MAP has been associated with a lower incidence of 90-day mortality, shorter ICU stay, and shorter mechanical ventilation time. MAP also affects haemodynamics: there is evidence of a causal relationship between high MAP and low perfusion index, both of which are associated with poor prognosis in mechanically ventilated patients. Elevated MAP values have also been associated with high central venous pressure and lactate, which are indicative of ventilator-associated right ventricular failure and tissue hypoperfusion, respectively. MAP, therefore, is an important parameter to measure in clinical practice. The aim of this review has been to identify the determinants of MAP, the pros and cons of using MAP instead of traditional protective ventilation parameters, and the evidence that supports the use of MAP in clinical practice.

Comparison of lung aeration loss in open abdominal oncologic surgeries after ventilation with electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP versus conventional PEEP: a pilot feasibility study.

Background: Existing literature lacks high-quality evidence regarding the ideal intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to minimize postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We hypothesized that applying individualized PEEP derived from electrical impedance tomography (EIT) would reduce the severity of postoperative lung aeration loss, deterioration in oxygenation, and PPC incidence. Methods: A pilot feasibility study was conducted on 36 patients who underwent open abdominal oncologic surgery. The patients were randomized to receive individualized PEEP or conventional PEEP at 4 cm H2O. The primary outcome was the impact of individualized PEEP on changes in the modified lung ultrasound score (MLUS) derived from preoperative and postoperative lung ultrasonography. A higher MLUS indicated greater lung aeration loss. The secondary outcomes were the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and PPC incidence. Results: A significant increase in the postoperative MLUS (12 ± 3.6 vs 7.9 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) and a significant difference between the postoperative and preoperative MLUS values (7.0 ± 3.3 vs 3.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) were found in the conventional PEEP group, indicating increased lung aeration loss. In the conventional PEEP group, the intraoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratios were significantly lower but not the postoperative ratios. The PPC incidence was not significantly different between the groups. Post-hoc analysis showed the increase in lung aeration loss and deterioration of intraoperative oxygenation correlated with the deviation from the individualized PEEP. Conclusions: Individualized PEEP appears to protect against lung aeration loss and intraoperative oxygenation deterioration. The advantage was greater in patients whose individualized PEEP deviated more from the conventional PEEP.

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

Invasive mechanical ventilation allows clinicians to support gas exchange and work of breathing in patients with respiratory failure. However, there is also potential for iatrogenesis. By understanding the benefits and limitations of different modes of ventilation and goals for gas exchange, clinicians can choose a strategy that provides appropriate support while minimizing harm. The ventilator can also provide crucial diagnostic information in the form of respiratory mechanics. These, and the mechanical ventilation strategy, should be regularly reassessed.

Intraoperative effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary atelectasis is common in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia, which increases the risk of perioperative respiratory complications. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) are used to open up the lung parenchyma with atelectasis, although the duration of their benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an ARM in laparoscopic colon surgery, the duration of response over time, and its haemodynamic impact. METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery were included. After anaesthetic induction and initiation of surgery with pneumoperitoneum, an ARM was performed, and then optimal PEEP determined. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange variables, and haemodynamic parameters, were analysed before the manoeuvre and periodically over the following 90 min. RESULTS: Three patients were excluded for surgical reasons. The alveolar arterial oxygen gradient went from 94.3 (62.3-117.8) mmHg before to 60.7 (29.6-91.0) mmHg after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained during the 90 min of the study. Dynamic compliance of the respiratory system went from 31.3 ml/cmH2O (26.1-39.2) before the manoeuvre to 46.1 ml/cmH2O (37.5-53.5) after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained for 60 min. No significant changes were identified in any of the haemodynamic variables studied. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery, performing an intraoperative ARM improves the mechanics of the respiratory system and oxygenation, without associated haemodynamic compromise. The benefit of these manoeuvres lasts for at least one hour.

Effectiveness of Helmet-CPAP in mild to moderate coronavirus type 2 hypoxemia: An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative effectiveness of Helmet-CPAP (H_CPAP) with respect to high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNO) in avoiding greater need for intubation or mortality in a medium complexity hospital in Chile during the year 2021. DESIGN: Cohort analytical study, single center. SETTING: Units other than intensive care units. PATIENTS: Records of adults with mild to moderate hypoxemia due to coronavirus type 2. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Need for intubation or mortality. RESULTS: 159 patients were included in the study, with a ratio by support of 2:10 (H_CPAP:HFNO). The 46.5% were women, with no significant differences by sex according to support (p = 0.99, Fisher test). The APACHE II score, for HFNO, had a median of 10.5, 3.5 units higher than H_CPAP (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank sum). The risk of intubation in HFNO was 42.1% and in H_CPAP 3.8%, with a significant risk reduction of 91% (95% CI: 36.9%-98.7%; p < 0.01). APACHE II does not modify or confound the support and intubation relationship (p > 0.2, binomial regression); however, it does confound the support and mortality relationship (p = 0.82, RR homogeneity test). Despite a 79.1% reduction in mortality risk with H_CPAP, this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.11, binomial regression). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Helmet CPAP, when compared to HFNO, was an effective therapeutic ventilatory support strategy to reduce the risk of intubation in patients with mild to moderate hypoxemia caused by coronavirus type 2 in inpatient units other than intensive care. The limitations associated with the difference in size, age and severity between the arms could generate bias.

The "ZEEP-PEEP test" to evaluate the response to positive end-expiratory pressure delivered by helmet: A prospective physiologic study.

Introduction: The improvement in oxygenation after helmet application in hypoxemic patients may be explained by the alveolar recruitment obtained with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or by the administration of a more accurate inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FiO2). We have designed the "ZEEP-PEEP test", capable to distinguish between the FiO2-related or PEEP-related oxygenation improvement. Our primary aim was to describe the use of this test during helmet CPAP to assess the oxygenation improvement attributable to PEEP application. Material and methods: We performed a prospective physiological study including adult critically ill patients. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before helmet application (PRE step), after helmet application without PEEP (ZEEP step) and after the application of the PEEP valve (PEEP step), while maintaining a constant FiO2. We defined as "PEEP responders" patients showing a PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement ≥10% after PEEP application. Results: 93 patients were enrolled. Compared to the PRE step, PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly improved during helmet CPAP both at ZEEP and PEEP step (189 ± 55, 219 ± 74 and 241 ± 82 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.01). Both PEEP responders (41%) and non-responders showed a significant improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio after the application of helmet at ZEEP, PEEP responders also showed a significant improvement of oxygenation after PEEP application (208 ± 70 vs 267 ± 85, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Helmet CPAP improved oxygenation. This improvement was not only due to the PEEP effect, but also to the increase of the effective inspired FiO2. Performing the ZEEP-PEEP test may help to identify patients who benefit from PEEP.

Phenotypes of esophageal pressure response to the change of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Background: Esophageal pressure (Pes) has been used as a surrogate of pleural pressure (Ppl) to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The relationship between Pes and PEEP remains undetermined. Methods: A gastric tube with a balloon catheter was inserted to monitor Pes in moderate to severe ARDS patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation. To assess the end-expiratory Pes response (ΔPes) to PEEP changes (ΔPEEP), the PEEP level was decreased and increased subsequently (with an average change of 3 cmH2O). The patients underwent the following two series of PEEP adjustment: (I) from PEEP-3 cmH2O to PEEPbaseline; and (II) from PEEPbaseline to PEEP+3 cmH2O. The patients were classified as "PEEP-dependent type" if they had ΔPes ≥30% ΔPEEP and were otherwise classified as "PEEP-independent type" (ΔPes <30% ΔPEEP in any series). Results: In total, 54 series of PEEP adjustments were performed in 18 ARDS patients. Of these patients, 12 were classified as PEEP-dependent type, and six were classified as PEEP-independent type. During the PEEP adjustment, end-expiratory Pes changed significantly in the PEEP-dependent patients, who had a Pes of 10.8 (7.9, 12.3), 12.5 (10.5, 14.9), and 14.5 (13.1, 18.3) cmH2O at PEEP-3 cmH2O, PEEPbaseline, and PEEP+3 cmH2O, respectively (median and quartiles; P<0.0001), while end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL) was maintained at an optimal range [-0.1 (-0.7, 0.4), 0.1 (-0.6, 0.5), and 0.3 (-0.3, 0.7) cmH2O, respectively]. In the PEEP-independent patients, the Pes remained unchanged, with a Pes of 15.4 (11.4, 17.8), 15.5 (11.6, 17.8), and 15.4 (11.7, 18.30) cmH2O at each of the three PEEP levels, respectively. Meanwhile, end-expiratory PL significantly improved [from -5.5 (-8.5, -3.4) at PEEP-3 cmH2O to -2.5 (-5.0, -1.6) at PEEPbaseline to -0.5 (-1.8, 0.3) at PEEP+3 cmH2O; P<0.01]. Conclusions: Two types of Pes phenotypes were identified according to the ΔPes to ΔPEEP. The underlying mechanisms and implications for clinical practice require further exploration.

Efectos intraoperatorios de una maniobra de reclutamiento alveolar en pacientes sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica de colon / Intraoperative effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery

Introducción: Las atelectasias pulmonares son habituales en pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal laparoscópica bajo anestesia general, aumentando el riesgo de complicaciones respiratorias perioperatorias. Las maniobras de reclutamiento alveolar (MRA) permiten la reexpansión del parénquima atelectasiado, aunque no está claramente establecida la duración de su beneficio. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la efectividad de una MRA en cirugía de colon laparoscópica, la duración de la respuesta en el tiempo y su repercusión hemodinámica. Métodos: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes sometidos a cirugía de colon laparoscópica. Tras la inducción anestésica e inicio de la cirugía con neumoperitoneo, se realizó una MRA y determinación posterior de la PEEP óptima. Se analizaron variables de mecánica respiratoria y de intercambio gaseoso, así como parámetros hemodinámicos, antes de la maniobra y periódicamente durante los 90 min siguientes. Resultados: Tres pacientes fueron excluidos por causas quirúrgicas. El gradiente alveoloarterial de oxígeno pasó de 94,3 (62,3-117,8) mmHg antes a 60,7 (29,6-91,0) mmHg después de la maniobra (p < 0,05). Esta diferencia se mantuvo durante los 90 min del estudio. La compliance dinámica del sistema respiratorio pasó de 31,3 mL/cmH2O (26,1-39,2) antes de la maniobra, a 46,1 mL/cmH2O (37,5-53,5) tras la misma (p < 0,05). Esta diferencia se mantuvo durante 60 min. No se identificaron cambios significativos en ninguna de las variables hemodinámicas estudiadas. Conclusión: En pacientes sometidos a cirugía laparoscópica de colon, la realización de una MRA intraoperatoria mejora la mecánica del sistema respiratorio y la oxigenación, sin apreciarse un compromiso hemodinámico asociado. El beneficio de estas maniobras se extiende al menos durante una hora.(AU)

Introduction: Pulmonary atelectasis is common in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia, which increases the risk of perioperative respiratory complications. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) are used to open up the lung parenchyma with atelectasis, although the duration of their benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an ARM in laparoscopic colon surgery, the duration of response over time, and its haemodynamic impact. Methods: Twenty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery were included. After anaesthetic induction and initiation of surgery with pneumoperitoneum, an ARM was performed, and then optimal PEEP determined. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange variables, and haemodynamic parameters, were analysed before the manoeuvre and periodically over the following 90 minutes. Results: Three patients were excluded for surgical reasons. The alveolar arterial oxygen gradient went from 94.3 (62.3-117.8) mmHg before to 60.7 (29.6-91.0) mmHg after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained during the 90 minutes of the study. Dynamic compliance of the respiratory system went from 31.3 ml/cmH2O (26.1-39.2) before the manoeuvre to 46.1 ml/cmH2O (37.5-53.5) after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained for 60 minutes. No significant changes were identified in any of the haemodynamic variables studied. Conclusion: In patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery, performing an intraoperative ARM improves the mechanics of the respiratory system and oxygenation, without associated haemodynamic compromise. The benefit of these manoeuvres lasts for at least one hour.(AU)

Reinforcement learning for intensive care medicine: actionable clinical insights from novel approaches to reward shaping and off-policy model evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Reinforcement learning (RL) holds great promise for intensive care medicine given the abundant availability of data and frequent sequential decision-making. But despite the emergence of promising algorithms, RL driven bedside clinical decision support is still far from reality. Major challenges include trust and safety. To help address these issues, we introduce cross off-policy evaluation and policy restriction and show how detailed policy analysis may increase clinical interpretability. As an example, we apply these in the setting of RL to optimise ventilator settings in intubated covid-19 patients. METHODS: With data from the Dutch ICU Data Warehouse and using an exhaustive hyperparameter grid search, we identified an optimal set of Dueling Double-Deep Q Network RL models. The state space comprised ventilator, medication, and clinical data. The action space focused on positive end-expiratory pressure (peep) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) concentration. We used gas exchange indices as interim rewards, and mortality and state duration as final rewards. We designed a novel evaluation method called cross off-policy evaluation (OPE) to assess the efficacy of models under varying weightings between the interim and terminal reward components. In addition, we implemented policy restriction to prevent potentially hazardous model actions. We introduce delta-Q to compare physician versus policy action quality and in-depth policy inspection using visualisations. RESULTS: We created trajectories for 1118 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and trained 69,120 models using 8 model architectures with 128 hyperparameter combinations. For each model, policy restrictions were applied. In the first evaluation step, 17,182/138,240 policies had good performance, but cross-OPE revealed suboptimal performance for 44% of those by varying the reward function used for evaluation. Clinical policy inspection facilitated assessment of action decisions for individual patients, including identification of action space regions that may benefit most from optimisation. CONCLUSION: Cross-OPE can serve as a robust evaluation framework for safe RL model implementation by identifying policies with good generalisability. Policy restriction helps prevent potentially unsafe model recommendations. Finally, the novel delta-Q metric can be used to operationalise RL models in clinical practice. Our findings offer a promising pathway towards application of RL in intensive care medicine and beyond.

High PEEP extubation as guided by esophageal manometry.

The ventilatory management of morbidly obese patients presents an ongoing challenge in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as multiple physiologic changes in the respiratory system complicate weaning efforts and make extubation more difficult, often leading to increased time on the ventilator. We report the case of a young adult male who presented to our ICU on two separate occasions with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring intubation. Esophageal manometry (EM) guided positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration was utilized during both ICU admissions to improve oxygenation and aid in extubation with spontaneous breathing trials performed on higher-than-normal PEEP settings and successful liberation on both occasions.

Comprehensive temporal analysis of right ventricular function and pulmonary haemodynamics in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac injury is frequently reported in COVID-19 patients, the right ventricle (RV) is mostly affected. We systematically evaluated the cardiac function and longitudinal changes in severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and assessed the impact on survival. METHODS: We prospectively performed comprehensive echocardiographic analysis on mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients, using 2D/3D echocardiography. We defined left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction as ejection fraction (EF) < 40%, or longitudinal strain (LS) > - 18% and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction if two indices among fractional area change (FAC) < 35%, tricuspid annulus systolic plane excursion (TAPSE) < 1.6 cm, RV EF < 44%, RV-LS > - 20% were present. RV afterload was assessed from pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), PASP/Velocity Time Integral in the right ventricular outflow tract (VTIRVOT) and pulmonary acceleration time (PAcT). TAPSE/PASP assessed the right ventriculoarterial coupling (VACR). RESULTS: Among 176 patients included, RV dysfunction was common (69%) (RV-EF 41.1 ± 1.3%; RV-FAC 36.6 ± 0.9%, TAPSE 20.4 ± 0.4mm, RV-LS:- 14.4 ± 0.4%), usually accompanied by RV dilatation (RVEDA/LVEDA 0.82 ± 0.02). RV afterload was increased in most of the patients (PASP 33 ± 1.1 mmHg, PAcT 65.3 ± 1.5 ms, PASP/VTIRVOT, 2.29 ± 0.1 mmHg/cm). VACR was 0.8 ± 0.06 mm/mmHg. LV-EF < 40% was present in 21/176 (11.9%); mean LV-EF 57.8 ± 1.1%. LV-LS (- 13.3 ± 0.3%) revealed a silent LV impairment in 87.5%. A mild pericardial effusion was present in 70(38%) patients, more frequently in non-survivors (p < 0.05). Survivors presented significant improvements in respiratory physiology during the 10th ICU-day (PaO2/FiO2, 231.2 ± 11.9 vs 120.2 ± 6.7 mmHg; PaCO2, 43.1 ± 1.2 vs 53.9 ± 1.5 mmHg; respiratory system compliance-CRS, 42.6 ± 2.2 vs 27.8 ± 0.9 ml/cmH2O, all p < 0.0001). Moreover, survivors presented significant decreases in RV afterload (PASP: 36.1 ± 2.4 to 20.1 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.0001, PASP/VTIRVOT: 2.5 ± 1.4 to 1.1 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001 PAcT: 61 ± 2.5 to 84.7 ± 2.4 ms, p < 0.0001), associated with RV systolic function improvement (RVEF: 36.5 ± 2.9% to 46.6 ± 2.1%, p = 0.001 and RV-LS: - 13.6 ± 0.7% to - 16.7 ± 0.8%, p = 0.001). In addition, RV dilation subsided in survivors (RVEDA/LVEDA: 0.8 ± 0.05 to 0.6 ± 0.03, p = 0.001). Day-10 CRS correlated with RV afterload (PASP/VTIRVOT, r: 0.535, p < 0.0001) and systolic function (RV-LS, 0.345, p = 0.001). LV-LS during the 10th ICU-day, while ΔRV-LS and ΔPASP/RVOTVTI were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 improvements in RV function, RV afterload and RV-PA coupling at day 10 were associated with respiratory function and survival.

Limiting Overdistention or Collapse when Mechanically Ventilating Injured Lungs: A Randomized Study in a Porcine Model.

RATIONALE: It is unknown whether preventing overdistention or collapse is more important when titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). OBJECTIVE: To compare PEEP targeting either minimal overdistention, minimal collapse or using a compromise between collapse and overdistention in a randomized trial, and assess the impact on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, inflammation, and hemodynamics. METHODS: In a porcine model of ARDS, lung collapse and overdistention were estimated by electrical impedance tomography during a decremental PEEP titration. Pigs were randomized to three groups and ventilated for 12 hours: PEEP set at ≤3% of overdistention (low overdistention); ≤3% of collapse (low collapse); and crossing point of collapse and overdistention (crossing-point). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six pigs (12/group) were included. Median PEEP were 7(IQR:6-8)cmH2O, 11(10-11)cmH2O, and 15(12-16)cmH2O in the three groups, p<0.001. With low overdistension, 6(50%) pigs died whereas survival was 100% in both other groups. Cause of death was hemodynamic in nature, with high transpulmonary gradient and high epinephrine requirements. Compared to the other groups, pigs surviving with low overdistension had worse respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during the entire protocol. Minimal differences existed between crossing-point and low collapse animals in physiological parameters but postmortem alveolar density was more homogeneous in crossing-point. Inflammatory markers were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP to minimize overdistention resulted in high mortality in an animal model of ARDS. Minimizing collapse or choosing a compromise between collapse and overdistention may result in less lung injury, with potential benefits of the compromise approach.

Quantifying heterogeneity in an animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome, a comparison of inspired sinewave technique to computed tomography.

The inspired sinewave technique (IST) is a non-invasive method to measure lung heterogeneity indices (including both uneven ventilation and perfusion or heterogeneity), which reveal multiple conditions of the lung and lung injury. To evaluate the reproducibility and predicted clinical outcomes of IST heterogeneity values, a comparison with a quantitative lung computed tomography (CT) scan is performed. Six anaesthetised pigs were studied after surfactant depletion by saline-lavage. Paired measurements of lung heterogeneity were then taken with both the IST and CT. Lung heterogeneity measured by the IST was calculated by (a) the ratio of tracer gas outputs measured at oscillation periods of 180 s and 60 s, and (b) by the standard deviation of the modelled log-normal distribution of ventilations and perfusions in the simulation lung. In the CT images, lungs were manually segmented and divided into different regions according to voxel density. A quantitative CT method to calculate the heterogeneity (the Cressoni method) was applied. The IST and CT show good Pearson correlation coefficients in lung heterogeneity measurements (ventilation: 0.71, and perfusion, 0.60, p < 0.001). Within individual animals, the coefficients of determination average ventilation (R2 = 0.53) and perfusion (R2 = 0.68) heterogeneity. Strong concordance rates of 98% in ventilation and 89% when the heterogeneity changes were reported in pairs measured by CT scanning and IST methods. This quantitative method to identify heterogeneity has the potential to replicate CT lung heterogeneity, and to aid individualised care in ARDS.

Critical Case of a Preterm Infant Infected With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Managed in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Case Report.

We describe a critical case of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in a preterm infant resulting in respiratory failure with advanced respiratory interventions and discharge from our hospital without the requirement for home oxygen therapy or tube feeding. The infant, delivered at 35 weeks gestation due to a premature rupture of the membranes with a birth weight of 2 kg, initially demonstrated a stable postnatal course. The baby required no resuscitation, with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at one and five minutes, respectively. The infant was discharged in good condition after four days of hospitalization. This report presents a critical case of RSV infection in a preterm infant requiring intensive care. The infant, born at 35 weeks gestation, initially appeared healthy but developed severe symptoms at 22 days old. The emergency evaluation revealed significant respiratory distress and confirmed RSV pneumonia. Following extensive interventions, including mechanical ventilation to manage severe symptoms, along with complications such as pneumothorax and a cardiac arrest episode, the infant exhibited a positive response to subsequent treatments. The infant responded positively to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and inhaled nitric oxide. Gradual weaning from advanced ventilation led to successful extubation, followed by recovery with high-flow nasal cannula therapy. The case highlights the challenges of managing severe RSV infections in preterm infants and the efficacy of intensive care interventions in facilitating the infant's remarkable recovery and discharge.

Future directions of lung-protective ventilation strategies in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by the heterogeneous distribution of lung aeration along a gravitational direction due to increased lung density. Therefore, the lung available for ventilation is usually limited to ventral, nondependent lung regions and has been called the "baby" lung. In ARDS, ventilator-induced lung injury is known to occur in nondependent "baby" lungs, as ventilation is shifted to ventral, nondependent lung regions, increasing stress and strain. To protect this nondependent "baby" lung, the clinician targets and limits global parameters such as tidal volume and plateau pressure. In addition, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to prevent dorsal, dependent atelectasis and, if successful, increases the size of the baby lung and lessens its susceptibility to injury from inspiratory stretch. Although many clinical trials have been performed in patients with ARDS over the last two decades, there are few successfully showing benefits on mortality (ie, prone positioning and neuromuscular blocking agents). These disappointing results contrast with other medical disciplines, especially in oncology, where the heterogeneity of diseases is recognized widely and precision medicine has been promoted. Thus, lung-protective ventilation strategies need to take an innovative approach that accounts for the heterogeneity of injured lungs. This article summarizes ventilator-induced lung injury and ARDS and discusses how to implement precision medicine in the field of ARDS. Potentially useful methods to individualize PEEP with esophageal balloon manometry, lung recruitability, and electrical impedance tomography were discussed.

Bedside personalized methods based on electrical impedance tomography or respiratory mechanics to set PEEP in ARDS and recruitment-to-inflation ratio: a physiologic study.

BACKGROUND: Various Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration strategies have been proposed to optimize ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to compare PEEP titration strategies based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to methods derived from respiratory system mechanics with or without esophageal pressure measurements, in terms of PEEP levels and association with recruitability. METHODS: Nineteen patients with ARDS were enrolled. Recruitability was assessed by the estimated Recruitment-to-Inflation ratio (R/Iest) between PEEP 15 and 5 cmH2O. Then, a decremental PEEP trial from PEEP 20 to 5 cmH2O was performed. PEEP levels determined by the following strategies were studied: (1) plateau pressure 28-30 cmH2O (Express), (2) minimal positive expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Positive PLe), (3) center of ventilation closest to 0.5 (CoV) and (4) intersection of the EIT-based overdistension and lung collapse curves (Crossing Point). In addition, the PEEP levels determined by the Crossing Point strategy were assessed using different PEEP ranges during the decremental PEEP trial. RESULTS: Express and CoV strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Positive PLe and Crossing Point ones (17 [14-17], 20 [17-20], 8 [5-11], 10 [8-11] respectively, p < 0.001). For each strategy, there was no significant association between the optimal PEEP level and R/Iest (Crossing Point: r2 = 0.073, p = 0.263; CoV: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.941; Express: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.920; Positive PLe: r2 = 0.037, p = 0.461). The PEEP level obtained with the Crossing Point strategy was impacted by the PEEP range used during the decremental PEEP trial. CONCLUSIONS: CoV and Express strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Crossing Point and Positive PLe strategies. Optimal PEEP levels proposed by these four methods were not associated with recruitability. Recruitability should be specifically assessed in ARDS patients to optimize PEEP titration.